The CPP Education Blog has moved to http://www.cppblogcentral.com/category/education-blog/. You will be redirected to the new blog.
Showing posts with label sensing preference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sensing preference. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Surviving General Ed II: The One Reality in the Universe (for this semester, at least...)

Learning to Learn Series 
By Jim Larkin and Jack Powers

Let’s face it: if you hate your major coursework, you’ve probably picked the wrong major and can only blame yourself. However, everyone has a bit more license when it comes to hating general ed. After all, taking the course wasn’t your idea, and you’ll probably never revisit the subject matter in the professional world. Nevertheless, you still need to earn that ‘A’.

In our last Learning to Learn post, we talked about how our preferences for either Sensing (S) or Intuition (N) affect how we approach general ed, and specifically focused on how those preferring Sensing can become engaged by practically connecting the course and their career. This time we’d like to approach it from the point of view of someone preferring Intuition (N), who may also hit a wall in general ed, but for very different reasons.

Losing steam at the halfway point
As someone who prefers N, you’re likely the wide-eyed, ‘eager-to-learn for learning’s sake’ type, curious about a wide range of subjects and viewing them as an opportunity to expand your horizons. Naturally, you find the subject fascinating and dive into the course with relish. You don’t empathize with the grumbling ‘S’ sitting next to you, who can’t find a single positive thing to say about the experience.

But midway, faced with the first test or term paper, the realities of having to hit the books start to peel the shimmer from this exercise in horizon expansion. Halfway through the course you’re just as burned out as the grumbling ‘S’ -- stuck in a class that’s draining your time and energy, yet has nothing to do with your future career.

It doesn’t have to be this way. By understanding your own personality type, you can maintain your engagement in the course, and earn that ‘A’ that you need to get into your grad school of choice. As those with an ‘N’ preference tend to become aware of meanings and relationships beyond the information given, you can leverage your natural curiosity and ability to focus on the big picture and future possibilities to maintain peak academic performance.

Connect to the big picture
As someone who generally views things from the big picture, any means of connecting the course to your larger career goals, or to the person that you aspire to become, will help you maintain interest and plough through less-than-inspiring coursework.

For example, while certain subjects may not be relevant to your future career, the skills that you learn -- cognitive, communicative, logical -- may very well be. In most professions, knowledge of subject matter is only half the picture -- often you need to be able manage a team and run a business to achieve success.

Also, if you were at one point fascinated with the subject matter, chances are you can be fascinated with it again -- try to reconnect with what sparked your interest in the first place.  

Focus on the one reality in the Universe -- the here and now
As interest in the course wanes, it may be advisable to flex your preference for Intuition and adopt behaviors that come more naturally to those preferring Sensing. As Charleton Heston said in Planet of the Apes, there’s only one reality in the universe: we are here, and this is now.

In your case, the one reality in your universe may be that you need an ‘A’ in this course to get into the graduate program of your dreams. Reminding yourself of that will help motivate you to buckle down and study.  

Developing your brain
Rather than viewing it as developing a skill that you don’t necessarily need, think of it as developing a brain function that you very much do need. Sure, you may never have to calculate the velocity of a 30-pound falling rock against 60 MPH wind, but those same logical, calculative brain abilities may prove to be very valuable in other contexts.

Embrace the value of moving beyond theory
For Ns, some of the deflation may occur when you’re required to move beyond the general theory of a subject, and actually start to apply the learning in practical ways. For example, you may enjoy discussing concepts like gravity in a Physical Science course, yet intensely dislike having to work through any sort of equation.

You can combat this by continually reminding yourself that digging in and doing some of the “dirty work” so to speak, is also very much a part of your journey toward becoming a well-rounded person. How much more interesting of a person will you be when you’re the only one at the dinner party who understands how to calculate the mass of a star? 

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Counseling to Type Strategies – Sensing (Part 2)

In our last post, I shared some suggestions for working with students who have a Sensing preference. Here are a few more to help you during your counseling sessions:

Discuss realistic and practical options.  When generating options for what you can do with a major in ___, focus on practical careers that have a linear, and possibly structured path to success, such as nursing or engineering.  This preference will also respond well to options that are linked to either the counselor’s personal experience, or experience of someone they know well and/or respect. 

 Limit brainstorming to a minimum. Rather than brainstorming all the careers you can do with a major in Journalism, this preference will respond better to a concrete list of careers that Journalism majors most often choose according to academic department data, Department of Labor Stats, the MBTI®Career Report, or some other trusted source of data. 

Is this correct? Using this phrase is one way to build greater buy-in with Sensing preferences.  “Is this correct” and “do you agree” will help a Sensing preference refine the discussion so it is more accurate and reflective of how they would describe the situation. 

Where’s the data? At the conclusion of the session, show a Sensing preference were  to find additional  data that will support your discussion, including web sites, books and people that can provide concrete fact back up. 


Can you provide a concrete example or description of an appointment they had with a Sensing preference student?  What did the session look like?  What are YOUR best suggestions for working with a student with a Sensing preference?

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Counseling to Type Strategies – Sensing (Part 1)


Back to our series on tailoring our counseling strategies based upon the type of student we are supporting!  This week we tackle the Sensing preference.

Here are some suggestions for working with students who prefer Sensing: 

Details please!
  These students are listening for, and will remember most, if not all, of the details you share during your session.  They are data and fact driven, so be sure to be prepared with things like anticipated job growth and career assessment data, and make sure your facts are accurate and relevant to the topic you are discussing. 

Provide concrete, real-life examples, rather than metaphors or stories, to illustrate the points you are reviewing with your student.

Speak in a linear manner.  This type of student wants the career process described in a sequential, linear way.  Start with step 1, then go to step 2, and move to Step 3, and so forth.  These students will get lost if you jump around to wherever the conversation leads or what inspires the counselor.  This is the student that the 4-year career plan was made for! 

Provide practical applications.  When explaining informational interviewing, for instance, clearly illustrate how this job search technique is a practical and linear process for narrowing a student’s major/career options.  

In my next post, I will give you four more suggestion before I move onto counseling strategies for students with a preference for Intuition. 
I

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Death, Taxes and General Education Requirements

Learning to Learn Series - Part 3
By Jim Larkin and Jack Powers

Let's face it, even if you find a major and career path that perfectly meshes with your talents and temperament, it still doesn't save you from general education requirements. It’s a universal pain point, like death and taxes. No matter how brilliant you are within your chosen field, you must endure a litany of courses with no apparent connection to your future, outside of their ability to sink your GPA, grad school plans and scholarship. So how does one survive general ed? 

People tend to approach general ed in two ways, depending on personality preferences for either Sensing (S) or Intuition (N), as presented by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® instrument. Those with either preference frequently hit a wall in general ed courses, but often at different points and for different reasons. 

Students with an S preference tend to focus on the practical “here and now,” and for them that “wall” comes almost immediately. If you’re a business major, for example, you may see having to take cultural anthropology or English composition as a waste of time with no practical career application. Consequently, you’ll be disengaged from the start.  

Focusing on the big picture
You can counter this by flexing your natural analytic abilities to understand that this is an experience that you must wade through to achieve your goals. Looking at the big picture may not be your immediate impulse, but viewing the course as a single rung in a ladder that leads to being able to do what you really want will help motivate you to buckle down and study.

Finding the method in the madness
If an immediate connection between the course subject matter and what you hope to do for a living eludes you, find one. For example, while as a business executive or engineer you may never be asked to produce an essay on the nihilistic voyeurism of Hemingway, you’ll certainly need to cogently, convincingly and at times creatively express your thoughts.

Those in technical fields are increasingly required to make the case for their initiatives to non-technical audiences -- to succeed, you’ll need better communication skills than the average math teacher. And for those with more administrative goals in mind, remember that a crackerjack speechwriter may not be there to help you with your big presentation. In such cases, you’ll be thankful if you paid attention in English class.

Take your general ed early
Finally, take your general ed courses as early as possible -- preferably your freshman and sophomore years. You may actually find that what you thought was your ideal career isn't so ideal, and that another course of study appeals more to you. If you don’t discover that until your junior year, it may be too late to switch directions.

In summary, if you've got a preference for Sensing, your general education stumbling block will be the perceived lack of practicality. However, if you dig a little deeper you may find that even if the subject matter is irrelevant, often the skills are highly relevant to your future, which will help you become more motivated and engaged to succeed.

Next time we’ll discuss how Intuitives (N) -- whose natural curiosity and big picture focus may get them initially stoked about a general ed course -- can avoid losing steam halfway through when the novelty of the new subject wears off and the coursework kicks in. 

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Creating Your Own Career Script


Managing Your Transition Home – Part 2
Written by Elizabeth and Katherine Hirsh

In high-stakes conflict situations, cooperation and single-minded adherence to command are vital. You need to know that you can count on those around you to follow the script. Going your own way is a last, rather than a first, resort. When pursuing a job or career development, however, there is no one-size-fits-all prescription. You need to find an approach that works for you. Knowing about your Myers-Briggs® personality type can help. Type theory recognizes that there are many different personal styles and thus many different ways of being effective.

One example of these style differences involves your preferred mode of taking in information—Sensing or Intuition. Understanding this and starting with the information most meaningful to you should help you narrow your search for a new job or career development opportunity.

What does it look like when people with these two different styles are investigating career options or job openings? In reading an online posting, for example, those who prefer Sensing are more likely to focus on the facts, specifics, and details contained in the posting. They want to learn about the daily realities of the job, its essential demands, and how well it fits their particular experience and skill set. Those who prefer Intuition are more likely to be interested in the possibilities, options, and themes suggested by the posting. They want to learn about how the job could offer opportunities to use their imagination, explore cutting-edge ideas, or innovate.

Searching for a new job or career after service can feel overwhelming. Using the Myers-Briggs assessment to help you systematically approach opportunities can bring a sense of order and clarity to the process. Knowing your preference for Sensing or Intuition can help you target your search to better suit your needs, interests, and skills.

You can learn more on the topic of psychological type and reintegration in our booklet Introduction to Type® and Reintegration.

Friday, August 24, 2012

People who prefer Sensing are good with details

Written by Catherine Rains

Although this is often true in terms of the behaviors exhibited by an individual with a Sensing preference, it is not true of ALL people who prefer Sensing.  What is wrong with this statement is the generalization at that ALL people with this preference will exhibit this behavior or will have this skill to the same degree as others with this preference.  A way to clean up this phrase would be to say “people who prefer sensing are often (usually, typically, generally, etc.) good with details.  Again, we don’t want to use language that boxes our client into have EVERY characteristic listed for Sensing in the Introduction to Type® booklet.  Most likely someone who prefers Sensing will exhibit many or even most of the characteristics, but not always or to the same degree. There are as many ways to express Sensing (and all of the preferences) as there as people.  I like the way Isabel Myers used to describe this -  someone who prefers INFP (what she preferred) can be like all INFP’s, some INFP’s or no INFP’s.  In other words, although there are only 16 types, there are a million ways to express those 16 types, making each person unique within their own type.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Behavioral Cues for Sensing

Written by Catherine Rains

Guessing someone’s preference for Sensing or Intuition is a bit tricky because all of us are picking up Sensing type information (facts, reality, specifics), but we all don’t do the same thing with this information. With people who prefer Sensing, they usually stick with the facts, without interpreting them. Here are some ways that I have observed this behaviorally. They:

• Sometimes have a very specific speech pattern , using concrete descriptive words and examples
• Might ask data collection questions that begin with words such as “how” and “what”
• Could be cautious to go beyond what is actual, or what is the reality of the moment
• Occasionally express a career interest in managing “what is”, serving people in practical ways, handling data (i.e. customer service, nursing, K-12 education, accounting)
• Might also be attracted to jobs that require routine and structure, and are usually not put off by repetition
• Sometimes remember the past accurately
• Might want to take a the MBTI® and/or Strong assessments to validate what they’ve already been considering, rather than for generating new options
• Could take notes when you are talking to remember all the details of what was discussed
• Might prefer non-fiction writing
• And my personal favorite – Often describe things in a linear way with lots of details (ask them for directions to someplace complicated for a good example!)

So what other behavioral cues do you use to pick up a preference for Sensing?